Case study: Navigating models of care in end of life services

TACSI worked alongside the SA Health’s Department of Health and Wellbeing team to investigate and analyse the potential for new models of care for end of life care, bereavement and grief.

The background

In 2022, TACSI was approached by SA Health’s Department of Health and Wellbeing to gather insights to understand the potential for a role/framework for grief and bereavement support that goes beyond the current service delivery.

Our approach

Over a period of six months in 2022, TACSI conducted an in-depth analysis of models of end of life care and services across a broad range of available services, including a review of Australian and international services.

We also conducted a series of 24 in-depth interviews with stakeholders, including:

  • People who currently deliver navigation models and/ or end of life care

  • People with lived and living experience of caring for someone transitioning through palliative and/or end of life care 

  • Carers caring for someone with a life limiting condition (LLC)

We placed a specific focus on individuals and groups who are traditionally underserved by the health sector, including (but not limited to) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, LBGTIQ+ people, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, and people living with disabilities.

We then distilled our learnings into a set of principles designed to inform a future service  model of care for the Department of Health and Wellbeing.

The insights

Services could be better connected

Patients and their caring networks have to navigate through a myriad of system and service supports at their end of life, many disconnected from each other.

The time needed to interact with services is overwhelming

There’s significant interaction with digital, legal, family and utility services, which can leave people feeling tired, stressed and overwhelmed.

Services can be too broad and don’t factor in unique needs

Both patients and carers have individual journeys and need specific support, with both groups encountering unique and specific barriers to access.

There’s a lack of diversity 

Marginalised groups called out a lack of diversity and choice in clinical, community and informal care.

 

Services often felt impersonal

Both patients and carers had encountered services that were ‘transactional’ or ‘impersonal’ and lacking in warmth, and this often prevented them from navigating the myriad of services, resources and information.

Practical support is just one part of the equation 

Participants told us that while being able to easily navigate and access services is critical, it's equally as important to be able to access services that provide social and emotional support. We called this Wayfinding = practical support and Wayfaring = emotional support.

A lack of death literate services

We heard that emotionally intelligent and death literate services needed to be a priority in forming a new approach to end of life care.

These learnings allowed us to draw out common stories, frameworks for understanding how to better support end of life navigation, and areas to focus investigation on. These will all contribute to providing guidance on how to continually improve care navigation for palliative care and end of life in SA.

Overview of transitions
Overview of transitions

The outcomes

Patients with Life Limiting Conditions (LLC) and their carers identified clear paths forward to improve end of life care:

  1. Better coordination of healthcare services 

  2. Better communication between services and patients (including language and medium) 

  3. Increased trust in services and cultural safety 

  4. Prioritising health services for and by Aboriginal people 

  5. Reliable, affordable and sustainable services 

  6. Distance and transport availability 

  7. Increase the available hours of operation, including how to access support out of ‘standard’ hours 

  8. Urgent review of out of pocket patient and carer costs (direct and indirect) 

  9. Technology access (especially for postal, phone, video and email requirements) 

  10. Equity and experience of discrimination based on gender, religion, disability, ethnicity, previous trauma and neurodivergence 

  11. Cultural appropriateness (including customs and cultural expectations around end of life) 

  12. Appropriate and timely referral 

Funding models, coordination and connection of services were all highlighted as critical to the success of any new models.

Talk to us about how we partner with people with lived and living experience to co-create better services.

We're social
Get in touch

ADELAIDE
Level 1, 279 Flinders St
Adelaide SA 5000

SYDNEY
1/145 Redfern Street

Redfern NSW 2016

Subscribe to our newsletter
Be the first to hear about TACSI events, resources, our big ideas, and new projects.
© 2024 TACSI
We acknowledge the Traditional Custodians and Owners of the lands in which we work and live on across Australia. We pay our respects to Elders of the past, present and emerging. We are committed to collaboration that furthers self-determination and creates a better future for all. Please note: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are advised that this website may contain images, voices or names of deceased persons in photographs, film, audio recordings or printed material.
At TACSI, diversity and inclusion is more than a statement; equality and accessibility are guiding principles embedded in everything we do. We strongly believe that it’s the collective sum of all our communities differences, life experiences, and knowledge that enables both ourselves and our partners to come together to tackle complex social issues. That’s why we’re committed to having a diverse team made up of people with diverse skills from all backgrounds, including First Nations peoples, LGBTIQ+, mature-age people, and people with visible and non-visible disabilities, regardless of sex, sexuality or gender identity.