We acknowledge the Traditional Owners/Custodians of the lands and waters on which we work and live on across Australia. We pay our respects to Elders past, present and emerging. We are committed to collaboration that furthers self-determination and creates a better future for all. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be aware that this website contains images and names of deceased persons.

The Australian Centre for Social Innovation

Case study: Navigating models of care in end of life services

TACSI worked alongside the SA Health’s Department of Health and Wellbeing team to investigate and analyse the potential for new models of care for end of life care, bereavement and grief.

Case study: Navigating models of care in end of life services
Case study

At a glance

What: Designing new models of care for bereavement, end of life care and grief.

Initiative: Good Death Impact Network

Sector: Health & mental health, Ageing

TACSI practices: Community innovation, Peer-to-peer, Co-design & co-production, Systems innovation

TACSI team: Barbara Binns, Danielle Abbott, Kerry Jones, lauren anseline

The background

In 2022, TACSI was approached by SA Health’s Department of Health and Wellbeing to gather insights to understand the potential for a role/framework for grief and bereavement support that goes beyond the current service delivery.


Our approach

Over a period of six months in 2022, TACSI conducted an in-depth analysis of models of end of life care and services across a broad range of available services, including a review of Australian and international services.

We also conducted a series of 24 in-depth interviews with stakeholders, including:

  • People who currently deliver navigation models and/ or end of life care
  • People with lived and living experience of caring for someone transitioning through palliative and/or end of life care
  • Carers caring for someone with a life limiting condition (LLC)

We placed a specific focus on individuals and groups who are traditionally underserved by the health sector, including (but not limited to) Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples, LBGTIQ+ people, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, and people living with disabilities.

We then distilled our learnings into a set of principles designed to inform a future service model of care for the Department of Health and Wellbeing.

The insights

Services could be better connected

Patients and their caring networks have to navigate through a myriad of system and service supports at their end of life, many disconnected from each other.

The time needed to interact with services is overwhelming

There’s significant interaction with digital, legal, family and utility services, which can leave people feeling tired, stressed and overwhelmed.

Services can be too broad and don’t factor in unique needs

Both patients and carers have individual journeys and need specific support, with both groups encountering unique and specific barriers to access.

There’s a lack of diversity

Marginalised groups called out a lack of diversity and choice in clinical, community and informal care.

Services often felt impersonal

Both patients and carers had encountered services that were ‘transactional’ or ‘impersonal’ and lacking in warmth, and this often prevented them from navigating the myriad of services, resources and information.

Practical support is just one part of the equation

Participants told us that while being able to easily navigate and access services is critical, it’s equally as important to be able to access services that provide social and emotional support. We called this Wayfinding = practical support and Wayfaring = emotional support.

A lack of death literate services

We heard that emotionally intelligent and death literate services needed to be a priority in forming a new approach to end of life care.

These learnings allowed us to draw out common stories, frameworks for understanding how to better support end of life navigation, and areas to focus investigation on. These will all contribute to providing guidance on how to continually improve care navigation for palliative care and end of life in SA.

Overview of transitions
Overview of transitions

The outcomes

Patients with Life Limiting Conditions (LLC) and their carers identified clear paths forward to improve end of life care:

  1. Better coordination of healthcare services
  2. Better communication between services and patients (including language and medium)
  3. Increased trust in services and cultural safety
  4. Prioritising health services for and by Aboriginal people
  5. Reliable, affordable and sustainable services
  6. Distance and transport availability
  7. Increase the available hours of operation, including how to access support out of ‘standard’ hours
  8. Urgent review of out of pocket patient and carer costs (direct and indirect)
  9. Technology access (especially for postal, phone, video and email requirements)
  10. Equity and experience of discrimination based on gender, religion, disability, ethnicity, previous trauma and neurodivergence
  11. Cultural appropriateness (including customs and cultural expectations around end of life)
  12. Appropriate and timely referral

Funding models, coordination and connection of services were all highlighted as critical to the success of any new models.

Talk to us about how we partner with people with lived and living experience to co-create better services.

Meet the project team

Read more about our work in this area

Explore the programs and initiatives where we’ve turned bold ideas into systemic action and measurable change.